Fresh air does not smell of fragrance

Frisk luft lukter ikke av parfyme.

Leave a comment

Er du ikke muslim da er du en hore, forstå det den som kan?

Er du ikke muslim da er du automatisk hore?

Jeg leste et innlegg i Aftenposten i dag der en kvinne forteller om hvordan muslimer ser på dem som ikke er muslimer og ikke anses tro på Gud.

“Anita Farzaneh (43) sitter på trikken og snakker med et familiemedlem.

«As-salamu alaikum!» hører hun plutselig fra en skjeggete, litt eldre mann. Farzaneh aner hva som kommer. Mannen vil sjekke om hun er en av dem, en god muslim. Denne muslimske måten å hilse på opplever hun som en test. Men Farzaneh har ikke tenkt til å late som. Hun svarer med det verdslige «hei!».

Mannen venter litt, før han sier, høyt og tydelig for alle i trikken:

«Er du ikke muslim?» Nei, svarer hun. «Hvorfor har du så kort skjørt?» Det er mitt valg, sier hun, og da kommer det: «Du er vantro og hore! Du kom bare hit for å få fri sex og alkohol!»” Aftenposten

Vantro, smake litt å det ordet, å si det ordet det er å være hovmodig – å mene at man er bedre enn andre. Hva sier Islam om hovmod? Er det en god egenskap?

Jeg er Skandinav, jeg er ikke muslim, jeg drikker ikke, jeg røyker ikke, jeg bruker ikke dop, jeg kler meg som jeg vil og jeg er ikke på byen og ragger menn for å ha sex. Dette er noe jeg har valgt selv, uten at noen har fortalt meg hva å gjøre, hverken foreldre eller noen andre. Godhet kommer fra innsiden. Det går fint an å være et fint og godt menneske, gå i skjørt og uten å være muslim. Det er ikke lengden på skjørtet eller valg av religion som bestemmer hvor mye godhet du har på innsiden, det bestemmer din innstilling til livet.

Ordet hore er en slangbetydning av en person som selger kroppen for penger. Om vi leser på Wikipedia:
Prostitusjon er salg av seksuelle tjenester mot betaling eller for andre gjentjenester. En person som selger seksuelle tjenester kalles på norsk for en prostituert eller sexarbeider. … I samfunnsdebatten benyttes ofte ordene “hore” for den som er den prostituerte, og “horekunde” for den som kjøper tjenesten av den prostituerte. Begge ordene er negativt ladet i det norske språk.” Wikipedia

Det virker litt uintelligent på meg at man drar liknelsen ved en ikke muslim og en hore spør du meg. Litt trangbodd i hodet som min far ville sagt om han hadde levd. Man er ikke automatisk hore fordi man ikke er muslim eller ikke tror på Gud.

Og skal ikke muslimer respektere folk av andre religioner, s.k. “Folk av boken”?

Mangel på oppdragelse, uforskammethet og hovmod er ikke en god egenskap. Jeg undrer hvor i Islam det står at det er okej?

/ Annelie


Leave a comment

A Muslim who Think Canada Should Ban the Niqab and Burka in Public

Today I read a article in Huffington Post that I find both good, right and interesting. It is good she comes out with this information, if someone like myself or any other non-muslim person would do that one risk to get the rasist flag smashed in ones face. The article is

As a Muslim, I Think Canada Should Ban the Niqab and Burka in Public

A Muslim mother who never saw a niqab when she was growing up in Karachi, Pakistan, she is astonished to see Canada’s judiciary caving in to Islamists who have nothing but contempt for Canada’s values of gender equality.

She says: “In the 25 years I have called Canada home, I have seen a steady rise of Muslim women being strangled in the pernicious black tent that is passed off to naïve and guilt-ridden white, mainstream Canadians as an essential Islamic practice.

The niqab and burka have nothing to do with Islam.

They’re the political flags of the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, the Taliban, al-Qaida and Saudi Arabia.

Now I learn I have not only to fight the medieval, theocratic adherents of my faith for a safe space for myself, I have to battle the Federal Court of Canada as well, which has come out on the side of these face masks.

The ruling concerns the case of Zunera Ishaq, a 29-year-old woman who emigrated to Canada from Pakistan in 2008.

After previously showing her face to an immigration official in 2013 when taking her citizenship test, she refused to take part in the citizenship ceremony because she would have to show her face while taking the oath of citizenship.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government rightly banned face masks at such ceremonies, but this was found to be unlawful by the Federal Court.

With all due respect, let me introduce our Canadian judges to their Pakistani colleagues in the jihadi badlands of Peshawar.

In November 2004, the Chief Justice of the Peshawar High Court (PHC), Tariq Pervaiz Khan, ordered female lawyers not to wear face veils in courtrooms, saying they couldn’t be identified, nor assist the court properly while wearing veils.

He scolded the niqabi women saying,”You are professionals.”

Covering the face is not a religious requirement for Muslim women.

The injunction in the Qur’an is for modesty (for men and women).

Some Muslim women interpret this as covering their head with a scarf or chador.

A scholar of Islamic history, Prof. Mohammad Qadeer of Queen’s University, Kingston, wrote in the Globe and Mail in March 2006:

“The argument about concealing one’s face as a religious obligation, is contentious and is not backed by the evidence.”

He added, “in Western societies, the niqab also is a symbol of distrust for fellow citizens and a statement of self-segregation. The wearer of a face veil is conveying: ‘I am violated if you look at me.'”

It is a barrier in civic discourse. It also subverts public trust.”

The federal Liberals and NDP are treating Canada’s niqabis as latter-day Rosa Parks, fighting for justice.

This is vote-bank politics that is, as my friend and secular activist Tarek Fatah calls it, “sharia Bolshevism.”

There is just one way forward: The next government must legislate the complete ban on wearing face masks in public, not just to expose the hypocrisy of the Islamists but for the sake of our security as well.” Huffiington Post

And this is my claim also. I have read about the use of burqa, niqab and such garments for some years and and found that

Purdah or Pardaa (from Persian: پرده, meaning “curtain”) is the practice of concealing women from men. According to one definition:

Purdah is a curtain which makes sharp separation between the world of man and that of a woman, between the community as a whole and the family which is its heart, between the street and the home, the public and the private, just as it sharply separates society and the individual.

This takes two forms: physical segregation of the sexes, and the requirement for women to cover their bodies and conceal their form. Purdah exists in various forms in the Islamic world and among Hindu women in parts of India.

This segregational issues is taken even further than only clothing, and women many places are not allowed to leave the house without their father, brother, cousin, husband or other male relative. They are not allowed to go to school, work, meet in groups, or in any way blend with the opposite sex. This leads to non equality between theh sexes and this is a really disturbing practise. It give men the upper hand to do what they want and rule the lives of the women while women have no say in the matter.  Read more here in my blog post about it and also see My Stealthy Freedom (آزادی یواشکی زنان در ایران‎) and follow their Facebook and visit their website
Personally I do not agree with face covering at alle regardless of reason because it makes the person anonymous and I am not able to see who I am talking to, if the person is tru, is lying, is happy, sad, angry, aggressive, feel well or is sick. The person is deporsonalized and it is literally as talking to a curtain.

At work I do not like when people enter to the desk vailed or masked regardless of reason, and when it is not acrually a rule that women shall cover all it is wrong to make claims for it. Beside that I do not like covering of women since it is a wrong against equal rights between men and women.

Source and read the whole article at: